<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Top 10 Lists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lucidagency.com/category/top-10-lists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lucidagency.com</link>
	<description>Solving Online Marketing Problems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 17:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>When Not to Use Paid Search (PPC)</title>
		<link>http://www.lucidagency.com/website-conversion-rate/paid-search-ppc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lucidagency.com/website-conversion-rate/paid-search-ppc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10 Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Website Conversion Rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucidagency.com/?p=538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great article by Scott Kaufmann of Lucid Agency explaining when not to use Paid Search (PPC) marketing. <a href="http://www.lucidagency.com/website-conversion-rate/paid-search-ppc/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paid search is a most usually a highly effective means of “response” oriented marketing. And, as you saw in my Paid Search for Branding article, it has some other applications as well. However, as with most other things in life, it’s best in moderation. With that said, here is my top 5 list of occasions when Paid Search may not make sense for a particular client or campaign.<span id="more-538"></span></p>
<p><strong>1.	Low Cost Product Sales</strong><br />
We’ve had more than one occasion when we’re approached by a company with a low dollar value product. Paid search campaigns are difficult with low dollar products, especially those that are one-time sales, where the end buyer isn’t signing up for a subscription where there will be a longer lifetime value. With a single-purchase, lower dollar value product, it’s very difficult to monetize profitably with paid search.<br />
To evaluate if you can be profitable running a paid search camping for a low dollar value ($40 or less for the purposes of this discussion), take a look a look the average cost-per-click in the category. Let’s say for example you are selling a product, perhaps a Boil Buoy on your own website. The retail sales price is $9.99. Let’s assume you make a 50% profit margin, meaning it costs you about $5 to make the product. So to make a profit selling this product for $9.99, which means you can’t spend more than $4.99 to sell each unit. Realistically, it would be much lower, as you need to make profit, cover overhead and other business expenses that would likely be factored into your breakeven analysis, but for the sake of simplicity, we’ll say there are no other costs being factored in. Now, if the cost-per-click in that category, is $1 per click, then you can break even selling this product (roughly) if you make 1 sale for every 5 clicks. That’s a 20% conversion rate of click to sale. Sounds pretty reasonable….right? Well considering the best e-commerce websites convert around 10-15% (see the article on our blog about <a title="Website Conversion Rate" href="http://www.lucidagency.com/website-conversion-rate/" target="_self">e-commerce conversion rates</a>), it might be a bit lofty to assume your client’s website will convert anywhere close to 20%. If it converts at 10%, then you will spend $10 on PPC for every sale, which will result in a $5 profit, meaning you will lose $5 on every sale. Not a good long term plan.<br />
If your client is a website like <a href="http://www.quirky.com" target="_blank">www.quirky.com</a> that sells a variety of products, you will have to run more sophisticated analysis to find out what the overall monetization rate for the site overall is, and most likely analyze cost per click by PPC category, to find out what categories of keywords, drive profitable visitors to your website. You would also want to consider the long term brand awareness of bringing new potential customers to your website, since some visitors might not buy anything right now, but might bookmark it for later.</p>
<p><strong>2.	No Tracking Capabilities</strong><br />
This one is simple. If your client wants to run a PPC campaign, for something that is metric driven such as lead generation, customer acquisition or product sales, and they don’t won’t work with you to put adequate conversion tracking in place – you’ve now got a recipe for disaster. To know if your campaign is tracking towards the goals you have set, you need to be able to establish the performance, which requires tracking. I’ve had clients tell me “Well, we just know PPC will work, so let’s not worry about the tracking”. 9 times out of 10, this will end with one party being unhappy – either you or the client.</p>
<p><strong>3.	Lack of Budget</strong><br />
You’ve got a client that is very excited about marketing their product and they’ve even allocated budget to market it with paid search. Great! When you ask what budget they have allocated (or ideally recommend the budget) and they let you know they have $100/month allocated. You know it’s not going to work. You won’t be able to get any usable conversion data. You won’t be able to efficiently manage the campaign and learn anything.</p>
<p><strong>4.	Wrong Goals</strong><br />
Your client comes to you with a goal that is outside the realm of smart uses of PPC. You’ll probably know this when it happens. For example, you client tells you they have a great idea – they  want to drive people to call them directly by putting the phone number in the ad. And they don’t need to allocate much budget, because they just want to have people call from seeing the ad, without going to their website.</p>
<p><strong>5.	You are marketing a free app</strong><br />
If you have a free app and you are trying to get awareness for it, PPC might not be the best solution, especially if you don’t have a plan to monetize it at any point in the future. If you have a paid App, such as an iPhone app, then think hard about what you are trying to do. If you think the product has great buzz potential, then maybe PPC can get some users of your app who will help spread the word (you should probably have a good plan for this as well). If not, and your app is $1.99..it will be difficult to profitably monetize it.</p>
<p>There are most certainly plenty of other instances in which PPC may not make sense. These are just a few I’ve run into in the recent past. Comment below and let me know what you’ve seen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lucidagency.com/website-conversion-rate/paid-search-ppc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Obstacles to SEO Success</title>
		<link>http://www.lucidagency.com/search-engine-optimization/top-10-obstacles-seo-success/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lucidagency.com/search-engine-optimization/top-10-obstacles-seo-success/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10 Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10 Obstacles to SEO Success]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucidagency.com/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Top 10 Obstacles to SEO Success in 2010 <a href="http://www.lucidagency.com/search-engine-optimization/top-10-obstacles-seo-success/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following list discusses the top 10 obstacles faced by today’s interactive marketers when pursuing search engine optimization success. These problems result from a lack of strategic or technical optimization, but do not discuss the so-called “black hat” or unethical optimization practices still being utilized by many SEO practitioners. These methods would include link farming, paid link exchanges, hidden keywords and many more.<br />
This article discusses both the issues associated with these organic search engine optimization obstacles, as well as how to take corrective measures and/or implement these effectively.<span id="more-418"></span></p>
<p><strong>1.	Competitors</strong><br />
In many cases a few industry leaders will dominate a web space. If you are starting a new website, or simply trying to topple a giant, you need to be aware of what the competition is doing well, and what it is not. Often the highest traffic keywords will have a group of 5 to 10 major competitors competing for them. In many industries, the large players will either have full-time SEO staff or will have SEO agencies on retainer, performing intensive organic search optimization. This can make it a time intensive and costly proposition to try to “dethrone” one or more of the leaders by getting a top 5 ranking in Google for a highly competitive keyword. To circumvent this problem, it’s often a good idea to start with a ranking analysis of your competitors. Determine what keywords they are ranking well for, and which ones they are not ranking well for. This will indicate areas of great opportunity for organic optimization. From there, spend time optimizing the keywords your competitors are not ranking well for. This will give you the advantage in niche areas where your website can be a leader.</p>
<p><strong>2.	Excessive Optimization</strong><br />
Excessive optimization, often called “keyword stuffing” is just as detrimental in 2010 as it was in 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006. People often ask me “what is the percentage of keywords” or “keyword density” that you can have on a page before the page should be considered “stuffed”. While we utilize a simple formula at Lucid Agency to give a general barometer, to be honest, it’s just as easy to follow this simple rule of thumb. If you can read a page and not tell that it is written for SEO purposes, and it sounds informative and readable for humans, then chances are it is not over-optimized. For example, did you realize that this section is optimized for “excessive optimization”? Probably not, because it was written to be informative and just happens to contain that keyword two times. Organic search rankings are intended to list the most useful and credible websites at the top of the list, so write with that objective in mind.</p>
<p><strong>3.	Not Utilizing Social Media in SEO Strategy</strong><br />
Social media is a great way to garner both traffic and inbound links, both of which are helpful for the objective of SEO – getting more qualified traffic to your website. While many search engine optimization strategies focus on the on-page and off-page elements of organic optimization, they often neglect social media. There are simple ways to utilize social media in search. A simple way to start is with a blog and a twitter account. Write a few good blog posts on topics relevant to your industry of expertise, providing useful information. These articles could be articles, picture posts, videos, interviews, white papers; really anything that your intended reader would find useful. Submit these blog posts via XML sitemap to the search engines. Then utilize a following of those interested in what you have to say on Twitter, and put up teasers to your blog posts. If you do this well, with any luck, some of your followers will put up links to your blog on their websites and blogs, gaining you both direct traffic from their reads, and also in bound links from their web properties.</p>
<p><strong>4.	Lack of Original Content</strong><br />
As they say in the world of search engine optimization, “content is king”. This has been the rule for many years, and is likely to prevail as one of the foremost guidelines in SEO. Search engines like content that is unique and new. And they like a lot of it. So just create a lot of good content and you’ll end up working wonders for your SEO campaign. If possible, lightly optimize this content and let the rest take care of itself.<br />
<strong><br />
5.	Lack of Quality Links</strong><br />
Nothing new here…links are the foundation of the Google algorithm and what originally separated them from the other search engines. If you consider Google a great “democracy” of sorts, and each link from a credible website as a “vote” for your website, then it’s simple to see that he with a lot of votes and a clear, in-depth message shall be the winner. Recently, other search engines have followed suit, and it’s no longer just Google valuing these links, but the other search engines as well. In addition, it’s also important to make sure you have links from many websites and that the websites are credible (not link farms). Further, there is some value to the outbound links on your website. When it comes to outbound links, search engines like to see a few links to valuable and related websites.</p>
<p><strong>6.	Slow Page Load Times</strong><br />
From many accounts, the new algorithm Google released last year, fondly named “caffeine”, we noticed an importance placed on page load times. This makes sense. If Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information, and provide the best results to those searchers looking for this information, they wouldn’t be doing a great job if the top ranking websites loaded very slowly, or didn’t load at all – thus providing a terrible experience to searchers. To remedy slow load times, try cleaning up code, taking out extraneous flash or third party loading galleries. If this doesn’t help, try a “fresh rebuild”, i.e. having a developer go through and rebuild the website in nice clean new code.</p>
<p><strong>7.	Website Structure Issues</strong><br />
If your website has a complicated or unintuitive directory structure, you may want to think about redoing it. The directory structures that work best for top organic rankings are the ones that are simple and intuitive, as this will help search engines and website visitors identify where in the website they are. Search engines use a directory structure to try and determine a relationship between different categorical items and pages on your website. If your structure makes no sense, it can only be detrimental for your rankings, and often the user as well. Fortunately, this is easy to fix up-front, and if you have a website running on a popular CMS platform such as WordPress or Expression Engine, there are many free plugins you can get to quickly and easily adjust the directory structure of your website. If you have a website that sells products for the construction industry, you might have a directory structure like ##www.plumbing-co.com/supplies/welding-supplies.html##, where you would list all of your welding supplies, which would be clear to both search engines and users alike.</p>
<p><strong>8.	Inaccurate or Duplicate Page Titles</strong><br />
Search engines give significant weight to website pages that are clear in their content focus. Titles are one of the best ways to indicate the intended focus of a website page. It is a best practice to include a unique, descriptive and lightly optimized title for your website pages. Don’t utilize keywords that are not relevant to the content of the web page, just write something that is useful and accurate, and if it can include the keyword then perfect. Remember titles are shown in search engine listings, so you want your title to be informative and compelling. After all, you are not only trying to get the top listing in Google, but you want people to click on your listing as well.</p>
<p><strong>9.	Missing XML sitemaps</strong><br />
XML sitemaps are a very simple way to make sure websites with many pages, and frequently changing content, are thoroughly and accurately indexed by search engines. Since search engines love fresh content, it is advantageous to make sure your website utilizes an XML sitemap, to ensure your “fresh” content is found and indexed quickly. XML sitemaps are simple to make and most web developers can implement them quickly.</p>
<p><strong>10.	New Websites</strong><br />
If you work in the SEO field, you’ve most likely had more than one potential client come to you with little more than a checkbook and a domain name. Often this potential client will want to “rank number 1 in Google” for their keyword-de-jour. While most agencies will gladly develop a plan to accomplish this, one of the largest barriers is something that cannot be fixed with any amount of money. Google and Bing (MSN and soon-to-be Yahoo) value the length of time a domain has been in existence. This is something often referred to in SEO slang as “the sandbox”. According to many industry experts Google reportedly puts new websites in something of a sandbox for a while, in an attempt to thwart large scale link efforts for new websites. While this is more theory than fact, Google engineer Matt Cutts has said that there are elements of the Google algorithm that may have an effect such as what has been described as the sandbox. What we can tell you is that we’ve noticed it certainly takes a little longer to get rankings for a new website than an older website. This is partially because of the generally lower number of existing links going to new websites, as well as the variety of other issues that are usually present with many new websites. To best counter this problem, get a new website up quickly, and slowly build up links to the website after the initial launch.</p>
<p>In closing, many of the issues hindering successful optimization aren’t particular difficult to solve, nor do they take a PHD in mathematics to figure out. Follow some simple tried and true optimization techniques, develop great content, get the word out, track your results and the rankings will take care of themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lucidagency.com/search-engine-optimization/top-10-obstacles-seo-success/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 100 Social Media Websites</title>
		<link>http://www.lucidagency.com/social-media/top-100-social-media-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.lucidagency.com/social-media/top-100-social-media-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Best Of" Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 10 Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 100 Social Media Websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lucidagency.com/?p=268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We spent a little time over the past week compiling a list of the top 100 social media websites, as reported by Alexa. Most of what we found was expected, some was not. For example, www.Scribd.com was number 7 on &#8230; <a href="http://www.lucidagency.com/social-media/top-100-social-media-websites/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We spent a little time over the past week compiling a list of the top 100 social media websites, as reported by Alexa. Most of what we found was expected, some was not. For example, <a title="Scribd" href="htt://www.Scribd.com" target="_blank">www.Scribd.com</a> was number 7 on the list. We knew the document sharing tool was getting more and more popular, but didn&#8217;t realize it has already ascended to a top 10 position that quickly. So, we thought we would use Scribd to post this full list. Enjoy! &#8211; Scott<span id="more-268"></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><script src="http://www.scribd.com/javascripts/view2.js" type="text/javascript"></script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.lucidagency.com/social-media/top-100-social-media-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

